|Table of Contents|

Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer

Journal Of Modern Oncology[ISSN:1672-4992/CN:61-1415/R]

Issue:
2017 10
Page:
1670-1673
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Robotic surgery in gynecologic cancer
Author(s):
Ma Rui; Ma Jiajia; Song Hui; Li Na; Zhou Fuxing; Liu Haixia; Chen Biliang; Sun Xiaoxia
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Xijing Hospital,Fourth Military Medical University,Shaanxi Xi'an 710032,China.
Keywords:
robotic surgery; Da Vinci robotic system; gynecological oncology; laparoscope
PACS:
R737.3
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2017.10.041
Abstract:
Minimally invasive surgery is a milestone of surgical operation in recent 30 years.As a revolutionary progress of minimally invasive surgery,robotic surgery has been widely used in the multidisciplinary field of surgery,also popularized dramatically in gynecological surgery.Compared with the laparoscopy,the Da Vinci surgical system offers advantages that include improved three-dimensional stereoscopic vision,wristed instruments which improve dexterity,and tremor canceling software which improves surgical precision.Those advantages not only save the time of surgeon,also improved the accuracy of each operation.This article reviewed recent progress about the application of Da Vinci robotic surgical system in gynecologic cancer.

References:

［1］Jung YW,Kim SW,Kim YT.Recent advances of robotic surgery and single port laparoscopy in gynecologic oncology［J］.J Gynecol Oncol,2009,20(3):137-144.
［2］Hockstein NG,Gourin CG,Faust RA,et al.A history of robots:from science fiction to surgical robotics［J］.J Robot Surg,2007,1(2):113-118.
［3］Ngo C,Cornou C,Rossi L,et al.Evidence for the use of robotically assisted surgery in gynecologic cancers［J］.Curr Opin Oncol,2016,28(5):398-403.
［4］Johansen G,Lonnerfors C,Falconer H,et al.Reproductive and oncologic outcome following robot-assisted laparoscopic radical trachelectomy for early stage cervical cancer［J］.Gynecol Oncol,2016,141(1):160-165.
［5］Kim TH,Choi CH,Choi JK,et al.Robotic versus laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients:a matched-case comparative study［J］.Int J Gynecol Cancer,2014,24(8):1466-1473.
［6］Park DA,Yun JE,Kim SW,et al.Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis［J］.Eur J Surg Oncol,2016,7:17.
［7］Shazly SA,Murad MH,Dowdy SC,et al.Robotic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer:A systematic review and meta-analysis［J］.Gynecol Oncol,2015,138(2):457-471.
［8］Corrado G,Cutillo G,Saltari M,et al.Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared with laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of locally advanced cervical cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy［J］.Int J Gynecol Cancer,2016,26(3):539-546.
［9］Vizza E,Corrado G,Mancini E,et al.Laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer:a case control study［J］.Eur J Surg Oncol,2015,41(1):142-147.
［10］Minig L,Zanagnolo V,Cardenas-Rebollo JM,et al.Feasibility of robotic radical hysterectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with locally advanced cervical cancer［J］.Eur J Surg Oncol,2016,42(9):1372-1377.
［11］Chong GO,Lee YH,Hong DG,et al.Robot versus laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer［J］.International J Gynecological Cancer,2013,23(6):1146-1150.
［12］Gil-Ibanez B,Diaz-Feijoo B,Perez-Benavente A,et al.Nerve sparing technique in robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy:results［J］.Int J Med Robot,2013,9(3):339-344.
［13］Corrado G,Cutillo G,Pomati G,et al.Surgical and oncological outcome of robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic and abdominal surgery in the management of endometrial cancer［J］.Eur J Surg Oncol,2015,41(8):1074-1081.
［14］Maenpaa MM,Nieminen K,Tomas EI,et al.Robotic-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer:a randomized controlled trial［J］.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2016,215(5):581-588.
［15］Schiavone MB,Bielen MS,Gardner GJ,et al.Herniation formation in women undergoing robotically assisted laparoscopy or laparotomy for endometrial cancer［J］.Gynecol Oncol,2016,140(3):383-386.
［16］Barraez D,Godoy H,McElrath T,et al.Low incidence of port-site metastasis after robotic assisted surgery for endometrial cancer staging:descriptive analysis［J］.J Robot Surg,2015,9(1):91-95.
［17］Chan JK,Gardner AB,Taylor K,et al.Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates［J］.Gynecol Oncol,2015,139(2):300-305.
［18］Guy MS,Sheeder J,Behbakht K,et al.Comparative outcomes in older and younger women undergoing laparotomy or robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer［J］.Am J Obstet Gynecol,2016,214(3):350-351.
［19］Chen CH,Chiu LH,Chen HH,et al.Comparison of robotic approach,laparoscopic approach and laparotomy in treating epithelial ovarian cancer［J］.Int J Med Robot,2016,12(2):268-275.
［20］Magrina JF,Cetta RL,Chang YH,et al.Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics,laparoscopy and laparotomy［J］.Gynecol Oncol,2013,129(2):336-340.
［21］Sandadi S,Gadzinski JA,Lee S,et al.Fellowship learning curve associated with completing a robotic assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy［J］.Gynecol Oncol,2014,132(1):102-106.

Memo

Memo:
国家自然科学基金（编号：81301921）；西京医院临床高新技术基金资助项目（编号：XJGX13LZ04)
Last Update: 2017-04-01