|Table of Contents|

Short term efficacy and complications analysis of laparoscopic Overlap anastomosis in radical resection of right colon cancer

Journal Of Modern Oncology[ISSN:1672-4992/CN:61-1415/R]

Issue:
2024 22
Page:
4329-4333
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Short term efficacy and complications analysis of laparoscopic Overlap anastomosis in radical resection of right colon cancer
Author(s):
HU BaigengZHANG ZheLIU YueSUN Liang
Department of Gastroenterology and Hernia,the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Yunnan Kunming 650032,China.
Keywords:
right-sided colon cancerintra-abdominal anastomosisextra-abdominal anastomosisOverlap anastomosis
PACS:
R735.3+5
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2024.22.018
Abstract:
Objective:To explore the clinical efficacy and value of intraperitoneal anastomosis in radical resection of right colon cancer by comparing the clinical data and short-term efficacy of peristaltic side-to-side anastomosis and extraperitoneal anastomosis under total laparoscopy.Methods:Clinical data of patients who underwent laparoscopic radical resection of right colon cancer in the Department of Gastrointestinal and Hernia of our hospital from January 2021 to December 2023 were retrospectively selected,and a total of 92 cases were included in the clinical study.According to different anastomosis methods and intraoperative space,patients with intraperitoneal Overlap were classified as ICA group.External abdominal end-to-side anastomosis was used as ECA group.Clinical data of the two groups were collected and analyzed,and the differences in safety and short-term clinical efficacy of total laparoscopic Overlap were discussed.Results:There was no significant difference in the general information of the included patients (P>0.05).In terms of surgical data,the operative time [(185.83±27.55)min,P=0.026] and anastomosis time [(33.86±4.05)min,P<0.001] of ICA group were significantly longer than ECA group.Incision length [(4.86±0.84)cm,P<0.001] ICA group was significantly shorter than ECA group.There was no significant difference in the number of intraoperative bleeding and lymph nodes between the two groups (P>0.05).In terms of postoperative rehabilitation,the first exhaust time [(2.55±0.55)days,P=0.001],the first inlet time [(3.38±0.62)days,P<0.001],getting out of bed time [(2.71±0.55)days,P=0.006],postoperative hospital stay [(7.67±1.26)days,P=0.019] of ICA group were better than ECA group,and the postoperative drainage volume of ICA group [(277.74±147.68)mL,P=0.017] was significantly less than ECA group.On day 3 after surgery,pain VAS score in ICA group (3.19±0.77,P=0.04) was lower than ECA group.In terms of postoperative inflammatory indicators,there were no statistically significant differences in the levels of C-reactive protein and neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) between the two groups (P>0.05).In terms of postoperative complications,there were no significant differences in the incidence of total complications,anastomotic leakage,abdominal infection,abdominal hemorrhage,anastomotic hemorrhage,incision infection,pulmonary infection,postoperative intestinal obstruction and postoperative gastroparesis between the two groups (P>0.05).Conclusion:Total laparoscopic Overlap is safe and feasible,and has the advantages of faster postoperative intestinal function recovery and less trauma.The surgical effect is comparable to that of traditional endoscopic-assisted surgery,and will not increase the incidence of short-term complications.

References:

[1]BRAY F,LAVERSANNE M,SUNG H,et al.Global cancer statistics 2022:GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2024,74(3):229-263.
[2]PHILLIPS EH,FRANKLIN M,CARROLL BJ,et al.Laparoscopic colectomy[J].Ann Surg,1992,216(6):703-707.
[3]ANANIA G,AGRESTA F,ARTIOLI E,et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy:the SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove Tecnologie) network prospective trial on 1 225 cases comparing intra corporeal versus extra corporeal ileo-colic side-to-side anastomosis[J].Surg Endosc,2020,34(11):4788-4800.
[4]TRPANIER M,VALIN-THORBURN A,KOUYOUMDJIAN A,et al.Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for right colectomy does not affect gastrointestinal recovery within an enhanced recovery after surgery program[J].Surg Endosc,2020,34(10):4601-4608.
[5]ABRISQUETA J,IBAEZ N,LUJN J,et al.Intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis in patients with laparoscopic right hemicolectomy[J].Surg Endosc,2016,30(1):65-72.
[6]LENDZION RJ,GILMORE AJ.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis and natural orifice surgery extraction/minimal extraction site surgery in the obese[J].ANZ J Surg,2021,91(6):1180-1184.
[7]MARTINEK L,YOU K,GIURATRABOCCHETTA S,et al.Does laparoscopic intracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis decreases surgical site infection rate? A propensity score-matched cohort study[J].Int J Colorectal Dis,2018,33(3):291-298.
[8]LIAO CK,CHERN YJ,LIN YC,et al.Short- and medium-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy:a propensity score-matched study[J].World J Surg Oncol,2021,19(1):6.
[9]ROSCIO F,BERTOGLIO C,DE LUCA A,et al.Totally laparoscopic versus laparoscopic assisted right colectomy for cancer[J].Int J Surg,2012,10(6):290-295.
[10]王少杰,黄平.完全腹腔镜下右半结肠癌切除术后回结肠吻合的研究现状与相关争议[J].结直肠肛门外科,2022,28(01):93-96. WANG Shaojie,HUANG Ping.Research status and related controversies of ileocolon anastomosis after complete laparoscopic right hemicolon resection [J].Colorectal and Anal Surgery,2022,28(01):93-96.
[11]JIAN-CHENG T,SHU-SHENG W,BO Z,et al.Total laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 3-step stapled intracorporeal isoperistaltic ileocolic anastomosis for colon cancer:An evaluation of short-term outcomes[J].Medicine (Baltimore),2016,95(48):e5538.
[12]BOLLO J,TURRADO V,RABAL A,et al.Randomized clinical trial of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy (IEA trial) [J].Br J Surg,2020,107(4):364-372.
[13]PARUCH JL.Extraction site in minimally invasive colorectal surgery[J].Clin Colon Rectal Surg,2023,36(1):47-51.
[14]ALLAIX ME,DEGIULI M,BONINO MA,et al.Intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileocolic anastomosis after laparoscopic right colectomy:A double-blinded randomized controlled trial[J].Ann Surg,2019,270(5):762-767.
[15]ZHANG M,LU Z,HU X,et al.Comparison of the short-term outcomes between intracorporeal isoperistaltic and antiperistaltic totally stapled side-to-side anastomosis for right colectomy:A retrospective study on 214 consecutive patients[J].Surg Open Sci,2022,9:7-12.
[16]HANNA MH,HWANG GS,PHELAN MJ,et al.Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy:short- and long-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis[J].Surg Endosc,2016,30(9):3933-3942.
[17]MILONE M,ELMORE U,ALLAIX ME,et al.Fashioning enterotomy closure after totally laparoscopic ileocolic anastomosis for right colon cancer:a multicenter experience[J].Surg Endosc,2020,34(2):557-563.
[18]胡茜玥,白峻阁,刘正,等.经自然腔道取标本手术规范化“无菌无瘤”的操作要点及临床研究证据[J].结直肠肛门外科,2022,28(05):432-437. HU Xiyue,BAI Junge,LIU Zheng,et al.Key points and clinical evidence of standardized "aseptic and tumor-free" specimen extraction through natural cavity passage [J].Journal of Colorectal and Anal Surgery,2022,28(05):432-437.
[19]WEBER MC,BERLET M,STOESS C,et al.A nationwide population-based study on the clinical and economic burden of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery[J].Langenbecks Arch Surg,2023,408(1):55.
[20]WITTICH P,MARQUET RL,KAZEMIER G,et al.Port-site metastases after CO(2) laparoscopy.Is aerosolization of tumor cells a pivotal factor[J].Surg Endosc,2000,14(2):189-192.
[21]NDUKA CC,POLAND N,KENNEDY M,et al.Does the ultrasonically activated scalpel release viable airborne cancer cells[J].Surg Endosc,1998,12(8):1031-1034.

Memo

Memo:
云南省科技计划项目(编号:202401AY070001-241)
Last Update: 1900-01-01