|Table of Contents|

Clinicopathological features and prognosis analysis of mixed invasive ductal-lobular carcinoma

Journal Of Modern Oncology[ISSN:1672-4992/CN:61-1415/R]

Issue:
2020 03
Page:
415-421
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Clinicopathological features and prognosis analysis of mixed invasive ductal-lobular carcinoma
Author(s):
Chen ShujieJi MinHe Qi
Department of Breast Surgery,the International Peace Maternity & Child Health Hospital of China Welfare Institute,Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine,Shanghai 200030,China.
Keywords:
breast cancermixed invasive ductal-lobular carcinomainvasive lobular carcinomainvasive ductal carcinomaclinicopathological featureprognosis
PACS:
R737.9
DOI:
10.3969/j.issn.1672-4992.2020.03.014
Abstract:
Objective:To investigate the differences of clinicopathological features and prognosis in mixed invasive ductal-lobular carcinoma (IDC-L),invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).Methods:We retrospectively analyzed the differences of clinicopathological features and prognosis between IDC-L,ILC and IDC patients which had complete clinicopathological and follow up data from Shanghai Jiaotong University Breast Cancer Database (SJTU-BCDB) between January 2009 and December 2015.Results:A total of 2 957 patients were enrolled,in which 109 were IDC-L,177 were ILC,and 2 671 were IDC.Multivariate analysis showed that compared to IDC-L,IDC patients were less likely to have multicenter lesion and lymphovascular invasion,and more likely to be HER2 positive and high expression of Ki-67 (P<0.05).Compared to IDC-L,ILC had older patients and less lymphovascular invasion (P<0.05).IDC-L patients were associated with decreased breast cancer-free interval (BCFI) and overall survival (OS) compared to IDC patients (BCFI:82.1% vs 90.7%,P=0.040,OS:91.0% vs 94.4%,P=0.029),while IDC-L patients had similar BCFI (82.1% vs 84.1%,P=0.803) and OS (91.0% vs 92.6%,P=0.803) with ILC patients.Multivariate analysis revealed that BCFI and OS were significantly associated with pathological type,tumor size,lymph node status and molecular subtype (P<0.05).IDC-L patients had worse BCFI (HR=1.67,95%CI:1.02~2.70,P=0.042) and OS (HR=1.89,95%CI:1.04~3.45,P=0.037) than IDC patients.Conclusion:The clinicopathological features of IDC-L patients are similar to those of ILC patients,but different from IDC patients.The prognosis of IDC-L is worse than that of IDC,but has no significant difference from ILC,which needs further study.

References:

[1]Sinn HP,Kreipe H.A brief overview of the WHO classification of breast tumors,4th edition,focusing on issues and updates from the 3rd edition[J].Breast Care (Basel),2013,8(2):149-154.
[2]Li CI,Uribe DJ,Daling JR.Clinical characteristics of different histologic types of breast cancer[J].Br J Cancer,2005,93(9):1046-1052.
[3]Dossus L,Benusiglio PR.Lobular breast cancer:Incidence and genetic and non-genetic risk factors[J].Breast Cancer Res,2015(17):37-44.
[4]Reynoso-Noverón N,Villarreal-Garza C,Soto-Perez-de-Celis E,et al.Clinical and epidemiological profile of breast cancer in Mexico:Results of the Seguro Popular[J].J Glob Oncol,2017,3(6):757-764.
[5]Flores Díaz D,Arce C,Flores Luna L,et al.Impact of invasive lobular carcinoma on long-term outcomes in Mexican breast cancer patients[J].Breast Cancer Res,2019,176(1):243-249.
[6]Chen Z,Yang J,Li S,et al.Invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast:A special histological type compared with invasive ductal carcinoma[J].PLoS One,2017,12(9):1-17.
[7]Li CI,Anderson BO,Daling JR,et al.Trends in incidence rates of invasive lobular and ductal breast carcinoma[J].Jama,2003,289(11):1421-1424.
[8]Lamovec J,Bracko M.Metastatic pattern of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast:an autopsy study[J].J Surg Oncol,1991,48(1):28-33.
[9]Arpino G,Bardou VJ,Clark GM,et al.Infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast:tumor characteristics and clinical outcome[J].Breast Cancer Res,2004,6(3):R149-R156.
[10]Pestalozzi BC,Zahrieh D,Mallon E,et al.Distinct clinical and prognostic features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast:Combined results of 15 international breast cancer study group clinical trials[J].J Clin Oncol,2008,26(18):3006-3014.
[11]Wasif N,Maggard MA,Ko CY,et al.Invasive lobular vs.ductal breast cancer:a stage-matched comparison of outcomes[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2010,17(7):1862-1869.
[12]Hanagiri T,Nozoe T,Mizukami M,et al.Clinicopathological characteristics of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast[J].Asian J Surg,2009,32(2):76-80.
[13]Yoder BJ,Wilkinson EJ,Massoll NA.Molecular and morphologic distinctions between infiltrating ductal and lobular carcinoma of the breast[J].Breast J,2007,13(2):172-179.
[14]Thomas M,Kelly ED,Abraham J,et al.Invasive lobular breast cancer:a review of pathogenesis,diagnosis,management,and future directions of early stage disease[J].Semin Oncol,2019,46(2):121-132.
[15]Mamtani A,King TA.Lobular breast cancer:different disease,different algorithms[J].Surg Oncol Clin N Am,2018,27(1):81-94.
[16]Rakha EA,Gill MS,El-Sayed ME,et al.The biological and clinical characteristics of breast carcinoma with mixed ductal and lobular morphology[J].Breast Cancer Res,2009,114(2):243-250.
[17]Arps DP,Healy P,Zhao L,et al.Invasive ductal carcinoma with lobular features:A comparison study to invasive ductal and invasive lobular carcinomas of the breast[J].Breast Cancer Res,2013,138(3):719-726.
[18]Zengel B,Yararbas U,Duran A,et al.Comparison of the clinicopathological features of invasive ductal,invasive lobular,and mixed (invasive ductal+invasive lobular) carcinoma of the breast[J].Breast Cancer,2015,22(4):374-381.
[19]Bharat A,Gao F,Margenthaler JA.Tumor characteristics and patient outcomes are similar between invasive lobular and mixed invasive ductal/lobular breast cancers but differ from pure invasive ductal breast cancers[J].Am J Surg,2009,198(4):516-519.
[20]Goldhirsch A,Winer EP,Coates AS,et al.Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer:Highlights of the St gallen international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2013[J].Ann Oncol,2013,24(9):2206-2223.
[21]Hudis CA,Barlow WE,Costantino JP,et al.Proposal for standardized definitions for efficacy end points in adjuvant breast cancer trials:The STEEP system[J].J Clin Oncol,2007(25):2127-2132.
[22]Suryadevara A,Paruchuri LP,Banisaeed N,et al.The clinical behavior of mixed ductal/lobular carcinoma of the breast:A clinicopathologic analysis[J].World J Surg Oncol,2010(8):51-59.
[23]Metzger-Filho O,Ferreira AR,Jeselsohn R,et al.Mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma of the breast:Prognosis and the importance of histologic grade[J].Oncologist,2019,24(7):e441-e449.
[24]McCart Reed AE,Kutasovic JR,Nones K,et al.Mixed ductal-lobular carcinomas:Evidence for progression from ductal to lobular morphology[J].J Pathol,2018,244(4):460-468.
[25]Acs G,Lawton TJ,Rebbeck TR,et al.Differential expression of E-cadherin in lobular and ductal neoplasms of the breast and its biologic and diagnostic implications[J].Am J Clin Pathol,2001,115(1):85-98.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 1900-01-01